CO129-171 - Acting Governor Austin - 1875 [7-11] -- Sir Kennedy - 1875 [12] — Page 184

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

the to the March had not been made" His Honour

of

spects of this order simply

as a consent order for the

re-cillochment of the Dangwee.

It

denno me

to

that it

virtually

rescimted all previous preceedings, and

- restored the parties to the position they occupied

by the previous order of March to the

Page 117

181

A

Submission Not The letter from the Minister to

the Chief Justice (Appendix F).

1874

in March

This letter was delivered by Rai Sin in

and

is quite

the

first seizing of the ship: it certainly ought to prevent

the order of March to the

March to the being

still more

treated as a

submission

considered as made by

from being cons

the

or ad

being emphatically

"an

admission by the King

"express consent "of the King.

absolutely

and irrevocably

of his indebtedness to Landstein He

Sexbmission

4 and 5 The notice and order for

change of Attornies (appendices D and E).

As the cause had slumbered since the order

of April 14th the change of Attornies could be no fresh

submission unless the

King

was

to be held bound

Mad

part of his credentials. His Honour

was mistaken in supposing

it to have been dated

in November 1873, the actual date in figures (4.1.

27th year of In Due) at the end show that it could

not have been written earlier than

February.

and the

receipt of it can

Honour to make a communication to the Colonial

therefore scarcely have induced His

Secretary

in the early stages of the suit. I can

scarcely think that the minister of a King

can

be taken to be

an

official letter written

to a

Judge

could in

by

any

by the sting of his

personal immunity from suit: especially in a case in which the plaintiff alleges

that he is

owing

Edit History

2026-05-21 03:53:42 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
the to the March had not been made" His Honour of spects of this order simply as a consent order for the re-cillochment of the Dangwee. It denno me to that it virtually rescimted all previous preceedings, and - restored the parties to the position they occupied by the previous order of March to the Page 117 181 A Submission Not The letter from the Minister to the Chief Justice (Appendix F). 1874 in March This letter was delivered by Rai Sin in and is quite the first seizing of the ship: it certainly ought to prevent the order of March to the March to the being still more treated as a submission considered as made by from being cons the or ad being emphatically "an admission by the King "express consent "of the King. absolutely and irrevocably of his indebtedness to Landstein He Sexbmission 4 and 5 The notice and order for change of Attornies (appendices D and E). As the cause had slumbered since the order of April 14th the change of Attornies could be no fresh submission unless the King was to be held bound Mad part of his credentials. His Honour was mistaken in supposing it to have been dated in November 1873, the actual date in figures (4.1. 27th year of In Due) at the end show that it could not have been written earlier than February. and the receipt of it can Honour to make a communication to the Colonial therefore scarcely have induced His Secretary in the early stages of the suit. I can scarcely think that the minister of a King can be taken to be an official letter written to a Judge could in by any by the sting of his personal immunity from suit: especially in a case in which the plaintiff alleges that he is owing
Baseline (Original)
the to the March had not been made" His Honour of spects of this order simply as a consent order for the re-cillochment of the Dangwee. It denno me to that it virtually rescimted all previous preeeedings, and - restored the parties to the position they occupied by the previous order of March to the 117.. 181 A Submission Not The letter from the Minister it to the Chief Justice (Appendix F). 1874 in March This letter wow clelivered by Rai Sin in and is quite ^ } the first seizing of the ship: it certainly ought to prevent the order of March to the March to the being still amore treated as a submission considered as made by from being cons the or ad being emphatically "an admission by the King "exprees consent "off the King. absolutely and irrevocably of his indebtedness to Landstein He Sexbmission 4 and 5 The notice and order for change of Attornies (appendieco D and £). As the cause had slumbered since the order of April 14th the change of Attornies could be no fresh submission unless the King Avas to be held bound Mad part of his credentials. His Honour mistaken in supposing it to have been date in November 1873, the actual date in figures (4.1. 27th year of In Due) at the end show that it could not have been written earlier than February. and the receipt of it can Honour to make a communication to the Colonial therefore scarcely have induced His Secretary in the early stages of the suit. I can an scaredy think that the minister of a King casc be taken to be CU official letter written to a Judge could in by amy by the sting of lis personal simunity from suit: expecially case in which the planitiff alleges iva that he is oring
2026-05-21 03:53:42 · Baseline
View content

the to the March had not been made" His Honour

of

spects of this order simply

as a consent order for the

re-cillochment of the Dangwee.

It

denno me

to

that it

virtually

rescimted all previous preeeedings, and

- restored the parties to the position they occupied

by the previous order of March to the

117..

181

A

Submission Not The letter from the Minister it to

the Chief Justice (Appendix F).

1874

in March

This letter wow clelivered by Rai Sin in

and

is quite

^ } ↑

the

first seizing of the ship: it certainly ought to prevent

the order of March to the

March to the being

still amore

treated as a

submission

considered as made by

from being cons

the

or ad

being emphatically

"an

admission by the King

"exprees consent "off the King.

absolutely

and irrevocably

of his indebtedness to Landstein He

Sexbmission

4 and 5 The notice and order for

change of Attornies (appendieco D and £).

As the cause had slumbered since the order

of April 14th the change of Attornies could be no fresh

submission unless the

King

Avas

to be held bound

Mad

part of his credentials. His Honour

mistaken in supposing

it to have been date

in November 1873, the actual date in figures (4.1.

27th year of In Due) at the end show that it could

not have been written earlier than

February.

and the

receipt of it can

Honour to make a communication to the Colonial

therefore scarcely have induced His

Secretary

in the early stages of the suit. I can

an

scaredy think that the minister of a King

casc be taken to be

CU

official letter written

to a

Judge

could in

by

amy

by the sting of lis

personal simunity from suit: expecially case in which the planitiff alleges

iva

that he is

oring

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.